Why don't I get a piece of that?: Why Americans hate people on welfare -- Guest Post

Another blogger wrote a piece in response to the vitriol I received after the Mercedes essay went viral. She was then afraid to post it on her own blog due to possible backlash from her American family for voicing her views.

I, of course, agreed to publish it here. I'm always down for a good defense of, well, me. But also of all of us. Of every person who has ever needed the system put in place to help us all.

So here it is.

...

Last month, I read the tale of how a former TV news producer and mother of twins had to drive her husband's Mercedes to the WIC Office (to pick up food vouchers).

I know—I'm super-late to this party already.

Her story has apparently hit close to home for many. But from looking at the 5000+ comments on the original piece, various other media outlets, her blog, and her Facebook page, many are also irate or disgusted by her story.

So let's get this straight. A taxpaying citizen hits a really rough patch financially, used the welfare system she and her husband paid into to help feed herself and her premature babies, and the internets exploded. In all sense of how the American welfare system was designed to be used (especially WIC), she did things right. She spent her time in "the system" to get back on her feet, then moved on when they were able to keep their heads above water again.

But going back to the comments—there are some really angry, bitter, and judgmental people out there. I remembered reading somewhere that the US is the most generous nation in the world—except, apparently, when it comes to giving government support to their own taxpaying citizens. I'm boggled by all the hate aimed at a family getting help to keep their heads above water.

I can only assume, in part, that Americans hate this story so much because it threatens the bootstrapping idea that should ideally lead one way up the income rungs. Two educated, middle-class workers starting a family are only supposed to climb the ladder. This paradigm has no room for a crises or unforeseen circumstances, and certainly no forgiveness for any real or perceived mistakes that would lead someone to apply for government support.

There's also a clear message in the comments for all those applying for government support: people should know their place. When financial trouble sets in, many Americans seem to except the full reversal of the rags-to-riches story. They should look the part of being poor—no matter that they had some nice things they bought for themselves. No matter that keeping a Mercedes was a sound financial decision given their predicament. Nope. Before you dare get help, you must exchange your blazer for that stained, grubby Coney Island tee no one would buy at the Goodwill. Oh, and don't forget to tease your hair up a bit and skip some showers for your best "lookin' poor" hairstyles.

Many Americans also seem to enjoy envisioning their own climb towards the American dream as a competition against other Americans. This reminds me of Monty Python's Flying Circus "Four Yorkshiremen" skit. You know, the one in which a bunch of men are nostalgically discussing how poor they once were or how hard they had it as kids, and each man tries to one-up the other with their story of misery? Yeah, Americans do that with their experiences with financial hardship or near-poverty experiences. "I was so poor I ate tuna straight from the can that I opened with a hammer and nails."

All satire aside, I think the largest reason Americans hate welfare is that not everyone gets a piece of it. But what if all Americans, rich or poor, had access to government support and entitlements? Sound odd? Impossible? Welcome to the Nordic countries, where time and time again we are making the news for offering the best quality of life in the world. I'm a dual-citizen American/Finn living in Finland. This is a nation of hard-working, innovative people. And yet everyone – rich or poor, old or young, immigrant or native, we all are entitled to our piece of the pie.

Here are just a few examples:

• Every adult is entitled to free higher education or vocational training, while also getting paid salary by the welfare agency to go to school or train.
• Everyone is entitled to free or dirt-cheap public heath care.
• Parents are entitled to approximately 100 euros per month per child to do whatever they wish with (presumably to help buy clothes and food, but there are no vouchers for this, just cash straight into your bank accounts).
• All parents, regardless of income, are entitled to highly subsidised (by the welfare agency) daycare.

...and the list goes on. The universality of our benefits and welfare is what makes these programs so highly valued to Finns. When everyone gets a piece of the pie, there's less disdain towards the takers. We're all takers – and much like Americans, we've paid for that right in our taxes. The difference here is, because both the rich and the poor and everyone in between get social benefits, the playing field is a bit more equal.

"Are There No Prisons? Are There No Work Houses?"

I live in Florida. Coming from New England, there has been a lot of adjustment, politically, religiously and otherwise for me, as I've learned to keep my mouth shut. I've never felt at such odds with my new state, however, than now. Now that they've passed a law requiring drug testing for potential welfare recipients.

Governor Rick Scott says it is "unfair for Florida taxpayers to subsidize drug addiction." His solution, of course, is to require those recipients to wait in line at designated areas, sit in a room with other people in the same situation waiting possibly hours for their name to be called so that they can urinate in a cup in front of someone as that person watches their every move. Then they get to wait for their results to come back. If they're "clean", they'll get their money back for the test. If they test positive for drugs, they are forced to front the money.

This, in my opinion, is a classist invasion of privacy that humilates those who are forced to ask their government for help. Supposedly helping the taxpayers, the $15 for each test that comes back negative will come out of the tax pool. But that's not going to be a problem, right? Because of all the money we'll save by refusing to help those in need because they also have an addiction. And what about those who test positive? They pay for their own tests. Because they can afford it. Right.  Even if the test comes back clean, when are those people going to get their $15 back? If they're applying for government assistance programs, they probably cannot afford to go without that $15 for any length of time.

I just can't wrap my mind around making poor people pay for a fairly expensive test out of their own pockets. "Oh, hey! You can't afford food! Maybe we'll help you, but first lend us fifteen bucks. We'll give it back to you at some point, we promise! If you qualify."

The potential recipients are not to bring their children to the test sites. So, not only do they need to magically come up with money they clearly do not have, they also have to arrange for childcare for that time period. Something I'm sure is really easy for them to coordinate and afford. What of those recipients that work? They'll need to take time off from their jobs, costing them more money.

What really gets me is that this affects people applying for the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. For needy families. So drug-addicted parents must have their innocent children pay for their mistakes? Their families don't deserve help because they have an addiction? Babies shouldn't get fed as punishment for the adults in their lives making what the government has decided is a mistake?

No, Gov. Scott has provided for this. Once the parent fails the test, he or she can designate another drug-free adult to apply for the help on their family's behalf. Of course, this presumes that the failing parents have access to a trusted drug-free adult to take the test for them. Which I'm guessing some of them probably don't.

Another problem with this law's intent is that Gov. Scott says "we want to give people an incentive to not use drugs."

Oh, okay. Because people using drugs can easily break from the habit. The only reason they're not doing so is because the government is giving them a few bucks here and there to buy bread and milk for their kids, or shelter their little ones from the elements.  Wait, are these things even connected? Do what you want with your government programs, I can't stop you, but don't wax idealistically at me as you hammer down the poor in this state with such a cynical law. I'm just saying, I'm pretty sure for at least some of these people, if they could stop using drugs, they would. Probably for their families. Not for your money.

Why don't poor people stop using drugs? Rehabilitation costs thousands of dollars. Thousands of dollars that these people do not have. Some of them don't have any support system to speak of at all. Instead of using tax-payer money to systematically test people to deem them worthy of our assistance, why don't we help fund the sorely lacking rehabilitation options for those without livable income?

We can't just push drug users to the side because of their habit. Their reliance on substances should not imply that they are not good enough for our support, for our thoughts, and for our help. They often need the most help of all.

This measure does not create jobs, it does not improve the economy and it does not help the poor in our state in this disastrous economical crisis. It does give a booming business to the walk-in clinic organization that Gov. Scott co-founded. Because, really, I'd rather my money go to a drug-testing corporation than to those in need.

Here is an article with more information: http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-01/politics/florida.welfare.drug.testing_1_drug-testing-drug-screening-tanf?_s=PM:POLITICS


___

Please consider voting for me here! They restarted and I lost my ranking. And if you really love me...Babble is the most important ranking to me, and I'd love you forever.  xxoo

Tales of an Unlikely Mother is on Babble.com. We're number 14, just scroll down and click on the thumbs up!