I'd like to start this diatribe with the realization that in posting this (assuming they read it) I'm totally blowing my chances of ever working for Policy Mic in the future. Which peeves me because at some point I'd have really liked to write for them. But, alas, it must be done.
After becoming embroiled in a mild skirmish on Twitter which they didn't really respond to, today, they published this piece on women's rights:
37 Men Show Us What Real Men's Activists Look Like
Where to begin?
First of all, can I just say I am so relieved to have 37 men telling me what they think about women. The pushback wasn't complete without an article highlighting men, guys.
Secondly, it's staged.
EIGHTEEN of the 37 pictures were taken in the same room. Since Policy Mic didn't remark on this, I can only assume they gathered their male employees in the cafeteria or something, and had them hold up signs so they could complete this assignment. I hope I'm wrong. Maybe it was another company who decided to do a project on it. But if that is the case, the project should be recognized, don't you think?
Here are a few examples of what I'm talking about.
Times that by 18. Call me cynical, but the message doesn't have the same impact when it feels like we are being tricked into thinking these were random calls to internet activism by men propelled by their own volition.
I mean, check this out. In 17 and 18, there is the same man in the same plaid shirt in the background (that guy is actually in the background of 15 and 16, too. Same pose. Everything.)
Also, 26 and 37 are the same picture.
Oh. Looks like they fixed that, now. ^^
Let's take a look at some of the signs, shall we?
4) Alpha males, huh?
5) "It takes strong women to give us the strength to know better." This is in regards to hitting women. I do not appreciate the implication that in order not to be hit I need to be a strong enough woman to teach a man not to do that.
8) "MRAs don't speak for me." ... Not all men.
10) "Because I'm a man and I will never hurt you." Not. All. Men.
21) "My masculinity doesn't include misogyny." NOT ALL MEN.
34) Wielding is spelled wrong, but more importantly, it's a sign indicating that the reason men should be involved is that their own safety is at stake. Which might be true. But isn't really what the conversation is about right now.
Also important to know that the man in #34 is a writer for Policy Mic. Which they didn't mention.
UPDATE: courtesy Brooke Binkowski, San Diego reporter.
#1 - PolicyMic founder Jake Horowitz
#9 - PolicyMic sports editor Bryan Graham
#12 - PolicyMic social media editor Jared Keller
#18 - PolicyMic editor Michael McCutcheon (and this shows that the room which is featured in half the photos is a PolicyMic room or somehow connected to PolicyMic).
#34 - PolicyMic contributor Charles Clymer
(Again, nothing wrong with that, but it needs to be noted in the article, guys).
37) "If there weren't women, there would be no men." Oh. Well. Um, thanks for that brand new information?
In the middle of this article, they ask us to use the #allmencan hashtag to make our voices known about what men can do.
I've said this many, many, many times before, but I'll say it again.
All men can LISTEN.
And if they were listening, well, maybe we wouldn't feel the need to post articles with them talking over us so much.